· Ernie Braganza · Blog article  · 8 min read

Nobody Left to Call Foul

American elections have always had referees—career officials who make sure nobody puts a thumb on the scale. Many of those officials are gone now, and Congress is moving bills that would make it harder to register and vote.

American elections have always had referees—career officials who make sure nobody puts a thumb on the scale. Many of those officials are gone now, and Congress is moving bills that would make it harder to register and vote.

Last updated: May 4, 2026

American elections have always had referees: career officials including the FBI and the Justice Department. Their job is to make sure nobody put their thumb on the scale. In 2020, when Trump pushed those officials to help him overturn the election, most of them refused. The system held.

But those referees are gone now. A ProPublica investigation found that at least 75 of them have been fired, forced out, or reassigned since Trump returned to office. In their place are roughly two dozen political appointees, ten of whom actively worked to reverse the 2020 election results.23 The administration isn’t just changing personnel. It’s replacing the people who said no with people who have already complied.

Making It Harder to Vote

Two bills moving through Congress would make it significantly harder to register to vote.

The SAVE Act would require you to show a passport or birth certificate to register for federal elections.8 That sounds reasonable until you consider that millions of eligible Americans don’t have those documents and face real hurdles getting them, including women who changed their name at marriage, people in rural areas, and low-income voters.9 The bill hardly stands a chance of catching a single fraudulent voter, since noncitizen voting is already vanishingly rare, but it would set up extra bureaucratic barriers and expenses that will discourage a lot of citizens who have the right to vote.9, 10

The lesser known MEGA Act would give the federal government more control over who stays on the voter rolls and make it harder for people to get back on once they’re removed.8 Together, these proposals point in one direction: fewer voters, more federal control over who gets to participate.

Loyalty Not Law

Here’s what the dismantling actually looks like in practice.

The agency that debunked Trump’s 2020 hacking claims, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), was one of the first targets. Within weeks of Trump’s second inauguration, CISA’s election security staff were put on leave. Their work to prevent hacking was frozen. Eventually they were all fired or transferred. The administration called their election work “electioneering.”23

The FBI’s public corruption team, which monitored criminal activity on Election Day, was disbanded. So was the Foreign Influence Task Force that tracked foreign interference in our elections.23

The Justice Department unit that enforces voting rights, particularly for communities of color, lost nearly all of its 30 career lawyers. Their replacements include attorneys who tried to overturn the 2020 vote.23

The DOJ’s internal watchdog for political interference, the Public Integrity Section, went from 36 lawyers to two. The man who ran it until early 2025 put it plainly: without those independent reviewers, “there is a much greater risk for intentional manipulation or inadvertent interference.”23

“Team America”

After clearing out the career staff, a group of political appointees started meeting at DHS headquarters. They called themselves “Team America” as if they were heroes straight out of a comic book. Their job was to find federal levers they could use to take control of how elections are run.23

These aren’t neutral technocrats. One co-founded an AI company with someone who pushed Trump’s Michigan election-hacking claims. Another is the source of the false story that more ballots were cast in Pennsylvania than there were voters, the same claim Trump repeated on the morning of January 6th. At least 11 Trump appointees with a hand in election matters have ties to an organization run by a lawyer who helped Trump try to overturn certified 2020 election results.23

More recently, “Team America” has been working to use a powerful federal law enforcement database to hunt for noncitizen voters and bring criminal charges, going beyond tools that have already proven hopelessly flawed for this purpose.23

Troops at the Polls

Trump has called for “nationalizing” elections, a push to shift control away from state and local officials toward partisan federal power.5, 6, 7 Draft plans have circulated among his allies that would let him declare a national emergency and seize authority over ballots and voting machines.11, 12, 13

There are also serious warnings that federal agents or National Guard troops could be stationed at polling places.14, 15 You don’t have to actually arrest anyone to suppress a vote. You just have to make people afraid to show up.

It’s Not Over Until They Win

In January 2026, federal agents showed up in Fulton County, Georgia, and walked out with hundreds of boxes of 2020 ballots.1, 3, 17

ProPublica traced that raid to Kurt Olsen, Trump’s director of election security, a lawyer who had already been sanctioned by courts for making baseless election claims. Olsen flew to Atlanta, pitched the seizure to the local FBI chief, and when that agent wouldn’t play along, the agent was pushed out. His replacement conducted the raid.23

The message sent to every election official in the country was that the ballots you count today can be seized and relitigated tomorrow.

Federal Courts Have Pushed Back

Some states have refused to comply, and, despite our recent disappointment with the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Voting Rights Act, courts have been siding with the states. Arizona’s Secretary of State told the Justice Department to “pound sand” when it demanded his voter rolls. He got sued and won. A Trump-appointed federal judge threw out the case.22, 20 Six federal courts have ruled against the administration on voter data demands. Rhode Island, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Oregon have all prevailed.22 The DOJ also has a pending suit against Virginia for voter data.24

It’s worth noting what the administration was actually looking for. The tool it’s been using to screen voter rolls for noncitizens is a federal immigration database with a documented pattern of flagging actual citizens as ineligible. The Brennan Center found it could “incorrectly identify someone as a noncitizen,” creating the very confusion about election integrity it claims to be preventing.22, 21 There is no evidence of widespread noncitizen voting. There never was.22

The court victories matter. The officials who refused to comply showed that resistance is possible and that the law is still on the side of voters. But courts can only rule on what’s brought before them. They can’t rehire the fired election security experts, un-disband the FBI’s corruption team, or undo the fear that’s already spreading among the local election workers who make our elections actually run.

What’s Really Happening

Step back and the pattern is clear. This isn’t about election security. No evidence of widespread fraud has ever been found, not in 2020 and not since.22 What’s happening is a deliberate effort to replace neutral administrators with loyalists, make voting harder for people without resources and time to gather documents, put federal muscle behind false partisan narratives, and ensure that if results don’t go as planned, there are tools ready to challenge them.

Democracies don’t usually collapse in one dramatic moment. They erode through a succession of small surrenders: one fired official, one intimidated poll worker, one bogus investigation, until people stop believing their vote counts — it becomes too much trouble to bother. That’s the real threat here.

The right to vote is under threat. It survives because people insist on it, because election workers show up, citizens pay attention, and communities refuse to be intimidated.18, 19 Let’s summon our courage and be brave together.

Sources

1. Brennan Center for Justice, “The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election”: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trump-administrations-campaign-undermine-next-election

3. CyberScoop, “Wyden warns Social Security chief: Trump’s voter database is ‘blatant voter suppression’”: https://cyberscoop.com/wyden-warns-ssa-chief-trump-voter-database-blatant-voter-suppression/

5. The New York Times, “Trump, in an Escalation, Calls for Republicans to ‘Nationalize’ Elections”: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/us/politics/trump-nationalize-elections.html

6. POLITICO, “Trump says Republicans should ‘nationalize’ elections”: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/02/trump-nationalize-elections-2026-midterms-00760015

7. The Hill, “Trump faces heat over call to nationalize elections; DHS funding at risk”: https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/5728160-trump-nationalize-elections-bipartisan-opposition/

8. Brennan Center and Democracy Docket analysis of the SAVE Act and MEGA Act: https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voting-and-elections/, https://www.democracydocket.com

9. Brennan Center and ACLU reporting on documentary proof-of-citizenship laws: https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voting-and-elections/, https://www.aclu.org/issues/voting-rights

10. ACLU fact sheets on documentary-proof-of-citizenship rules: https://www.aclu.org/issues/voting-rights

11. Washington Post, “Trump, seeking executive power over elections, is urged to declare …”: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/02/26/trump-elections-executive-order-activists/

12. Democracy Docket, “Read a draft of the emergency executive order for Trump to take control of elections”: https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/exclusive-read-the-draft-executive-emergency-order-for-trump-to-take-control-of-elections/

13. Truthout, “Trump Allies Circulating Draft Order to Declare National Emergency …”: https://truthout.org/articles/draft-order-to-declare-national-emergency-on-elections-circulating-trump-allies/

14. VoteBeat, “Can Trump send National Guard troops to the polls in the 2026 election?”: https://www.votebeat.org/2026/01/20/trump-national-guard-troops-polling-places-2026-election-insurrection-act/

15. Democracy Docket, “Armed troops shouldn’t be ‘anywhere near’ polling sites”: https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/air-force-general-armed-troops-shouldnt-be-anywhere-near-polling-sites/

17. NPR, “The FBI seizure of Georgia ballots relies on debunked claims”: https://www.npr.org/2026/02/10/nx-s1-5710649/fulton-county-2020-election-affidavit-fbi

CBS News, “Fulton County expert witness says FBI affidavit used to seize ballots had …”: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fulton-county-2020-election-materials-court-hearing-fbi/

18. Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation: https://www.reaganfoundation.org/ronald-reagan/quotes/voting-is-a-precious-right-that-for-two-centuries

19. League of Women Voters voting rights quote collection: https://www.lwv.org/blog/powerful-quotes-voting-rights-march-washington

20. Washington Times, “Federal judge dismisses DOJ lawsuit against Arizona seeking voter data” (April 28, 2026): https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/apr/28/federal-judge-dismisses-doj-lawsuit-arizona-seeking-voter-data/

21. Brennan Center for Justice, analysis of SAVE database reliability: https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voting-and-elections/

22. The Guardian, “Judge thwarts Trump administration’s attempt to access Arizona voter rolls” (April 28, 2026): https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/28/arizona-voter-rolls-trump-administration

23. ProPublica, “8 Things You Should Know About Trump’s Effort to ‘Take Over’ the Midterm Elections” (May 1, 2026): https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-midterm-elections-takeover-takeaways; full investigation: https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-midterm-elections-takeover

24. Department of Justice Press Release, “Justice Department Sues Virginia for Failure to Produce Voter Rolls” (January 16, 2026): https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-virginia-failure-produce-voter-rolls

Back to articles

Related Posts

View All Posts »
A Federal Master List Will Deny Citizens the Vote

A Federal Master List Will Deny Citizens the Vote

The traditional strength of American elections has always been its decentralization. Creating a national master list of eligible voter is doomed to failure and is an attempt to deny the vote to vunerable populations.

What's Next?

What's Next?

Let's use the energy from our protests to make a difference.